Skip Navigation
Judging the Environment judicial nominations photo
 

A project tracking federal judicial nominations and courts.


Defenders of Wildlife

Editorials and Opinion

 

Issue
Nominee
Publication
Opinion Type
 

 

Items 31 - 60 of 8653  Previous12345678910Next

Editorial: Rep. Goodlatte takes aim at the Bay cleanup, again (Free Lance-Star [VA] , 07/05/15)
"The Chesapeake Bay Foundation is suing the state of Virginia for its failure to require farmers to erect fencing that would keep livestock out of the Bay’s tributaries. Virginia’s farmers are proving themselves a cooperative bunch. They are taking seriously key best management practices, .... But the improvement gained through those efforts is lost when livestock wades into streams and relieves itself, creating a significant sewage pollution issue. ... The state agencies would do well to revisit the permit language, add the fencing requirement, seek funding to assist the operations in meeting the provision and settle the suit. Money put toward that purpose is much better spent than on litigation defense."

Judicial Vacancies (American Bar Association, 07/02/15)
"Our nation is disadvantaged when our federal judiciary does not have sufficient judges to hear cases and resolve disputes in a thorough and timely fashion. ... Neither the Senate Judiciary Committee nor the Senate has acted expeditiously to confirm pending nominees. In fact, during the first three months of this Congress, the Senate failed to hold any confirmation votes, ... it appears that leadership has decided to slow-walk the process for reasons that have nothing to do with the qualifications of the nominees.... As a result, the number of vacancies and courts with judicial emergencies are increasing and the backlog of civil lawsuits keeps growing.... To further add to the strain on the federal judiciary, dozens of new judgeships are needed, according to the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts (AO), especially in the Delaware and the border courts where caseloads are crippling. On March 19, 2015, the Judicial Conference submitted its request for 73 new judgeships and the conversion of nine temporary ones into permanent judgeships."

EDITORIAL: Court’s mercury rule hurts N.J. (Daily Record [NJ], 07/01/15)
"U.S. Supreme Court ... justices struck down U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s standards for mercury pollution from power plants. The standards would have applied to roughly 600 plants, cutting mercury pollution up to 90 percent and preventing an estimated 11,000 deaths each year. Those standards would have been of great benefit to New Jersey, which has worked hard to reduce mercury pollution within the state but is still burdened burdened with pollution coming in from beyond our borders.... This decision — we hope — will only be a minor and short-lived detour."

Now do you understand why the courts matter so much? (NC Policy Watch, 06/30/15)
Rob Schofield: "Conservatives have been blockading and filibustering the President’s nominees at all levels of the federal judiciary since he took office in 2009. Part of this problem is just the increasingly divided nature of modern American politics, but another significant part is clearly attributable to an intentional, longstanding effort by powerful forces within the American conservative movement to remake the federal judiciary.... Senator Richard Burr has successfully pulled off a solo, unexplained filibuster of the President’s efforts to fill the oldest federal court vacancy in the country. ... the nine justices of the Supreme Court decide a handful of cases each year while the 900 judges who comprise the rest of the federal judiciary decide thousands. Let’s hope the recent narrow decisions serve as a wake-up call to all progressives to become regularly engaged in helping to determine who those justices and judges are at all levels."

D.C. Circuit Caseload Rises From Spike in Agency Challenges (National Law Journal, 06/30/15)
"The caseload of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit rose sharply over the past year from new administrative challenges to environmental regulations and labor rulings, Chief Judge Merrick Garland said at the circuit’s judicial conference last week. The increase in new cases, which Garland estimated at nearly 30 percent, comes on the heels of criticism that the circuit’s caseload statistics did not justify filling judicial vacancies. Some Senate Republicans in 2013 opposed to three nominations to the D.C. Circuit—Patricia Millett, Cornelia Pillard and Robert Wilkins—cited declines in the court’s caseload. Between March 2014 and March 2015, the D.C. Circuit saw a more than 20 percent increase in new appeals filed, from 941 to 1,138, according to the most recent publicly available case data. The biggest jump was in new administrative cases, which nearly doubled....The appeals court has a full bench for the first time in more than 22 years, Garland said. In November 2013, the U.S. Senate invoked the so-called “nuclear option" to allow Democrats to push through President Barack Obama’s stalled D.C. Circuit nominees."

EDITORIAL: A Divided Court on Three Big Rulings; Micromanaging the E.P.A. (New York Times, 06/30/15)
"Writing for the majority, Justice Scalia rejected the agency’s argument that it considered costs at a later stage.... The problem, as Justice Elena Kagan explained in a sharp dissent, is that the E.P.A. considered the costs connected to the emissions rule “over and over and over again.”"

Juan Williams: The pollution of politics (The Hill, 06/29/15)
Opinion column: "Congress has lost its ability to be pragmatic and solve the nation’s big problems.... Part of the problem is that Republicans in Congress have such a strong aversion to Obama. Their primary objective throughout his presidency has been to block his plans, from ObamaCare to immigration; infrastructure spending to judicial nominations."

EDITORIAL: Clean air gets scrubbed (Baltimore Sun, 06/29/15)
"The irony, of course, is that in holding up the rules which were expected to be finalized this summer, it's the Supreme Court that has cost the American people. Power plants are by far the major source of airborne mercury ... The consequences of this should be troubling to all, including the justices who ruled against the EPA — Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Chief Justice John Roberts."

Robert Bork Wouldn't Have Changed History (Bloomberg News, 06/29/15)
Jonathan Bernstein column: "As a compromise candidate, Kennedy would preserve the president’s ability to influence the court far into the future, yet also reflect the Senate’s preferences. (Senate liberals and moderates wouldn't have dreamed of blockading just any Reagan nominee, as Republicans have done for some appeals-court vacancies under Obama.)"

Restrepo committee vote delayed (CA3blog, 06/25/15)
"As feared, this morning the Senate Judiciary Committee postponed a vote on the Third Circuit nomination of L. Felipe Restrepo, without explanation. Apparently this means no vote until after July 4 at the earliest."

A new pattern of obstruction as Chuck Grassley delays hearings for long-pending nominees (Justice Watch, 06/24/15)
Kyle Barry, Alliance for Justice: "the Judiciary Committee Chairman appears to be guaranteeing at least three consecutive weeks without a confirmation hearing....Mary Barzee Flores for the Southern District of Florida, and Julien Neals for the District of New Jersey—have already waited four months for a hearing, and both are nominated to critical “judicial emergencies” in their home states.... Grassley has held himself to “the Leahy standard in 2007,” when Senator Patrick Leahy was the committee chairman, and Democrats controlled the Senate under President George W. Bush. But at this point in 2007, Senator Leahy had convened five confirmation hearings for 17 judicial nominees, while only 13 nominees have had hearings this year. This is in addition to the enormous disparity on confirmations—four this year compared to 21 by the end of June in 2007."

Has the Senate Really Turned a Corner? (Wall Street Journal, 06/24/15)
Jim Manley column: "under Sen. McConnell, the Senate is on pace to confirm the fewest judicial nominations of any recent Congress. Republican senators are blocking efforts to confirm judges in their home state to spite the president. Where is the leadership in that?”

Judiciary committee schedules Thursday vote on Restrepo nomination (CA3blog, 06/23/15)
Matthew Stiegler: "The Senate Judiciary Committee has scheduled a committee vote on the Third Circuit nomination of L. Felipe Restrepo for this Thursday. That is less than a week before Judge Rendell takes senior status and opens a second vacancy on the court which already has been operating under a judicial emergency for over four months now. Fingers crossed."

No One is Tying Pat Toomey's Hands Except Himself (People For blog, 06/23/15)
"According to the Legal Intelligencer, Chuck Grassley’s staff is telegraphing his plans to delay a committee vote for Third Circuit nominee Phil Restrepo ... Even worse, according to their reporting, Senator Pat Toomey is not currently planning on doing anything to prevent a two-week delay in a committee vote to fill this emergency vacancy until after the July 4 recess, even though a second vacancy on the same court opens on July 1.... Of course, as Senator Toomey well knows, no one is claiming that he can “control” the scheduling of votes, and no one is asking him to. What Pennsylvanians are asking him to do is to speak up on Judge Restrepo’s behalf, to ask Chairman Grassley not to delay the committee vote. You don’t have to be a committee member to speak up on behalf of a nominee you support. Senators do that all the time."

If Judiciary Committee Delays Restrepo Vote, Blame Pat Toomey (People For blog, 06/23/15)
"The Judiciary Committee has announced that it will hold an executive meeting this Thursday morning, and a vote on Third Circuit nominee L. Felipe Restrepo is on the agenda. But ... once Obama became president, Republicans exercised the right of the minority party to have a committee vote “held over” (delayed) by at least a week without cause in all but 12 instances for President Obama’s judicial nominees, which is an unprecedented abuse of the rules. ... Yet there have been exceptions. ... Yet there have been exceptions. ... With the Senate out next week for its Independence Day recess, holding the vote over will delay it by at least two weeks ... This is an opportunity for Pat Toomey to show leadership. He can – and should – push for a committee vote this week. If he has any influence among his colleagues, they will listen to him."

Juan Williams: McConnell misfires in Senate (The Hill, 06/22/15)
Juan Williams column: "“And then there is McConnell's continuing bad faith on judicial nominations. Since taking control of the Senate in January, he has allowed only four district court nominees to be confirmed. Not one circuit court judge has been able to win GOP Senate approval. A quick check of history by Jennifer Bendery of The Huffington Post showed that, at this point in President George W. Bush's second term, the Democratic Senate majority had confirmed 15 of the Republican's district court nominees and three for the circuit court.... the Senate under Republican leadership remains dysfunctional .... It is obviously in McConnell’s interest to get the Senate to work. That means demonstrating the ability to work with Democrats. Continuing to delight in trying to snooker the Democrats is not a winning strategy to help Republicans retain power. It invites derision from people who continue to give the entire Republican Congress dreadfully low ratings. It is not trashing McConnell to tell him to stop digging if he wants to get out of this hole."

UPDATED: IOWA EDITORIAL BOARDS: FILL FEDERAL JUDICIAL VACANCIES (, 06/19/15)
MORE THAN 30 EDITORIAL BOARD OPINION LINKS & EXCERPTS

“World-Herald editorial: Swift action on judge is warranted” (Hercules and the umpire blog, 06/17/15)
Senior U.S. District of Nebraska Judge Richard George Kopf: "Please read the editorial, Swift action on judge is warranted, Omaha World-Herald (June 17, 2015) (“Nebraskans can hope consideration of a highly qualified nominee such as Rossiter doesn’t become a political tug of war and that he can receive speedy consideration.”) From their lips to Chairman Grassley’s ears.*... We need Bob Rossiter tomorrow! The powerful Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and a Nebraska neighbor, can make a quick confirmation hearing a reality. I hope Mr. Grassley is listening."

World-Herald editorial: Swift action on judge is warranted (Omaha World-Herald [NE] , 06/17/15)
"The wheels of justice may grind slowly, but that’s nothing compared to the grind of filling a vacancy on the federal bench. Currently, there are 59 vacancies on federal courts around the country, with at least one opening dating to 2010. The National Women’s Law Center calculated that about one-third of the vacancies were in courts “so overburdened that they have been designated ‘judicial emergencies’ by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.” Nebraska has one of the 59 vacancies. But President Barack Obama finally has made a nomination: Omahan Robert Rossiter Jr.... Nebraskans can hope consideration of a highly qualified nominee such as Rossiter doesn’t become a political tug of war and that he can receive speedy consideration. Vacancies on the federal bench mean individuals and businesses must wait longer for cases to be resolved. And as the legal maxim says, justice delayed is justice denied."

Stalling over judgeships makes no sense (Omaha World-Herald [NE] , 06/17/15)
Jerry Freeman letter: "The recent World-Herald story on the nomination of Robert Rossiter Jr. to the federal bench demonstrates the long wait and needless delays in filling much-needed federal judgeships. ... Now another long wait seems assured for U.S. Senate confirmation. All of this despite Rossiter being a Republican, the state’s two U.S. senators being Republican and the Republicans now in the majority of Congress. Seems to me an attorney of his caliber could breeze through this kind of process in about five minutes of study. Just another example of gridlock in our nation’s capital."

Editorial: Lack of a wolf plan should have U.S. howling mad (Albuquerque Journal [NM], 06/16/15)
"The public ... deserves to know what that final goal is. According to a 2014 lawsuit against Fish and Wildlife by Defenders of Wildlife [and others] “the absence of a legitimate agency blueprint for Mexican gray wolf recovery underlies the ongoing challenges facing the subspecies’ recovery program. Accordingly, those challenges could be resolved through the production and implementation of a scientifically based and legally valid recovery plan to guide and drive Mexican gray wolf management decisions, such as scheduled releases to promote genetic diversity, necessary limitations on wolf removals by FWS and the public, and delineation of appropriate geographic areas to facilitate wolf recovery.”"

Sen. Pat Toomey must push for vote to confirm Judge Luis Restrepo (Morning Call [PA], 06/16/15)
Glenn Sugameli, Judging the Environment, Letter to the Editor: "The story, "Senate Judiciary panel vets Pa. nominee," reports that "there's more waiting for" Judge Luis Felipe Restrepo after the "uneventful" hearing on his nomination to the U.S Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Sen. Pat Toomey, the story said, "noted the unanimous Senate approval when Restrepo was nominated to his district judgeship: 'I hope to see exactly such a confirmation occur this year.'" But "this year" suggests further needless delays of Restrepo's November nomination to fill a 2013 vacancy the U.S. Courts declared a judicial emergency. Those pressing for swift action include newspaper editorial boards and the Hispanic National Bar Association. A Pittsburgh City Council resolution urged a floor vote before another Pennsylvania Third Circuit seat is vacated on July 1, when Judge Marjorie Rendell takes senior status. Until Sen. Toomey persuades his majority leader, Sen. Mitch McConnell, to allow a prompt vote, justice delayed from lack of judges will continue to be justice denied."

Editorial: Where have all the honeybees gone? (Record Journal [CT], 06/15/15)
"Bees pollinate some 80 percent of plant species, and about a third of our food supply depends on them. Some crops, such as almonds, are completely dependent on bees for pollination. But the honeybees have been disappearing ... current theory is that there may be multiple factors involved, including disease, bacteria, parasites — and pesticides, including synthetic nicotine pesticides called neo-nicotinoids.... it should be a major concern for all of us, because all of us depend on honeybees for our sustenance."

EDITORIAL: Earth's warming is clear to Virginians (Virginian-Pilot, 06/15/15)
"On climate change, Virginians - and the people of Hampton Roads - are more likely than most other Southerners to recognize the perils of inaction. For good reason. Rising seas and sinking land pose a greater risk to people and businesses in this region than anywhere else on the East Coast. The trick, now, is to get more of the state's elected officials to come to terms with that reality and advance policies that both manage necessary adaptations and take advantage of potential opportunities.... Temperature data show close to unequivocally that the planet is getting warmer; the world's largest review of the science concludes that man is almost certainly causing it by burning fossil fuels and cutting down forests; and a third large review of the literature shows that just about every climate scientist agrees."

Sen. Johnson, enough obstruction on judges: The GOP senator's obstruction has left a crucial federal judgeship open for some 2,000 days and counting. (Wausau Daily Herald [WI] , 06/13/15)
Opinion Column by Nan Aron: "Central to the latest wrangling over a federal appeals court vacancy is one crucial fact: Wisconsin's vacancy on the Seventh Circuit is the oldest circuit court vacancy in the entire country. It's been empty since Judge Terence Evans stepped down in January 2010. That was 2,000 days ago. In that time, the president has successfully filled about 300 other judicial vacancies around the country"

Editorial: Do not take Florida panther off endangered list (Tampa Bay Times [FL], 06/12/15)
"Count this among the most shortsighted ideas to emerge from state wildlife protection bureaucrats in recent memory: They want the Florida panther to be removed from the federal endangered species list. Apparently, 150 to 250 Florida panthers are just too many. This is the wrong move for Florida and for the panthers, and it could reverse decades of work aimed at protecting the animals.... reducing federal regulation is not the answer."

Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp on the nomination of Bob Rossiter (Hercules and the umpire blog, 06/12/15)
Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp, U.S. District Court, District of Nebraska: "Nebraska is among eight states having a single federal district and only three authorized judgeships. In this group, Nebraska has by far the heaviest docket. For the 12-month period ending September 30, 2014, Nebraska ranked first among these districts in its per-judgeship weighted filings, felony caseload, and supervised release hearings. The prompt confirmation of Nebraska’s newest federal district judge will be essential to ensure that federal litigation in Nebraska is adjudicated promptly and efficiently."

Melgen still being held (Southern District of Florida Blog, 06/11/15)
David Markus: "In other news, a few judges had a smooth hearing with the judiciary committee yesterday. It's very slow going... Hopefully Mary Barzee Flores will be up soon."

Grassley’s dirty little secret on nominees (Des Moines Register [IA], 06/11/15)
Opinion column By Des Moines attorney John Hearn: "Senator Grassley recently recruited five Iowa lawyers to select two nominees for him to give to the president. As near as I can tell, the lawyers are all die-hard Republicans. Predictably, their nominees are Republicans, and in Grassley’s eyes, more likely to rule for big business and conservative causes in line with Grassley’s own ideology. Now when Grassley receives the president’s nominees, he will have political cover to say that a committee of Iowa lawyers has already selected the most qualified nominees. Then true to form, he can hold up a constitutionally mandated Senate vote on the president’s nominations, presumably until the next election (a year and one-half away), hoping for a Republican president, who will nominate Grassley’s like-minded nominees."

The Register's Editorial: Grassley can press "go" on judicial nominees (Des Moines Register [IA], 06/11/15)
"There are 26 "judicial emergencies" in federal trial and appeals courts ... Grassley assures that he is moving ahead on all judicial nominees that have sent over from the White House, including courts of appeals judges, which can be contentious, and trial-court judges, which typically are less controversial. "The Judiciary Committee is moving nominees through the process in the same timeframe, or even better, as established under the former majority," Grassley said in a statement sent to the Register. Grassley's staff said he is moving judicial nominees out of the committee at the same pace as the committee did during the last two years of President George W. Bush's term, when the Senate was controlled by the Democrats...."I've said from my first day as chairman that I'll seek to move consensus nominees," Grassley said....it is encouraging that McConnell has walked back his threat to block the president's nominees. Both senators should now demonstrate by their actions they mean what they say."