Editorials and Opinion
EDITORIAL: President Barack Obama’s tough love for the planet (Milwaukee Journal Sentinel [WI], 06/03/14)
"The Obama administration finally took the leadership role it needs to take on climate change when the Environmental Protection Agency announced a plan Monday to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from power plants by 30% from 2005 levels by 2030.... the administration has set the right target, and, done right, the rule could lead to significant mitigation of climate change if other nations follow, as well as a stronger economy through the development of new technologies and new markets."
Editorial EPA plan to curb carbon emissions is pragmatic, smart and overdue (Los Angeles Times, 06/03/14)
"Federal law compels the EPA to reduce harmful air pollutants, and carbon dioxide from power plants is the largest contributor by far to changes in the climate that could be ruinous to the planet....The EPA's expansive approach is certain to be tested in court by those upset about the prospect of more expensive electricity. ...Global warming threatens to be an environmental catastrophe, and the U.S. must prevent as much of the damage as it can. As multiple recent studies have concluded, the cost of dealing with the worst effects of climate change will far outweigh the cost of preventing them."
NJ should applaud Obama crackdown on power plants: Editorial (Star-Ledger Newark [NJ] , 06/03/14)
"President Obama’s announcement yesterday of new carbon rules to fight global warming is the most important thing he’s done in office, along with health care reform. Not only will it force reductions in carbon pollution from our nation’s coal-fired power plants, it will put a burner under research into green technologies, which in the end is our only hope to reduce the threat of climate change....New Jersey should be especially glad about this, given that most of the coal emissions we breathe float our way from the Midwest and South, where the plants don’t have to use anti-pollution equipment to filter out the worst soot. The new federal limits are going to greatly benefit our health, preventing countless asthma attacks and premature deaths."
Editorial: EPA finally gets U.S. into climate game: Our View (USA Today, 06/02/14)
"If the plan survives the inevitable political and legal assaults, it will prevent a not-inconsequential hundreds of millions of tons of heat-trapping carbon dioxide from entering the atmosphere. ...Monday's announcement marks the start of a far saner approach for the United States, one that will resonate globally."
Editorial: The Report Card for June 3 (Asheville Citizen-Times [NC] , 06/02/14)
"A to President Barack Obama’s push on climate change. Using executive authority by proposing new EPA regulations, the president announced a proposal Monday to cut carbon emissions from power plants 30 percent by the year 2030."
Editorial: A modest start on cutting carbon pollution (Tampa Bay Times [FL], 06/02/14)
"The carbon-cutting plan the Obama administration unveiled Monday is not the fastest or most effective approach to reducing global warming pollution. But with Congress refusing to act, someone has to lead and take bold action on an issue that will require sustained attention for decades. The plan should force Gov. Rick Scott and the Florida Legislature to stop ignoring accepted science on global warming and craft a more thoughtful energy policy.... it comes as the federal courts have strongly endorsed the EPA's authority to regulate air pollution."
Editorial: Good goals for our planet (Anniston Star [AL] , 06/02/14)
"On Monday, the Obama administration issued new rules governing carbon emissions....Expect a host of lawsuits from big polluters. ... In the real world, increased carbon emissions are warming our planet. The overwhelming scientific consensus says so, and there’s no debate. The nation and the world needs a leader who will spur action on this crisis. While Monday’s announcement is positive, it’s clear Obama doesn’t have the capacity to bring about the changes required."
EDITORIAL: Bold step to curb carbon pollution (Denver Post [CO] , 06/02/14)
"The Obama administration's plan to cut carbon emissions from power plants by 30 percent by 2030 from the level that existed in 2005 appears ambitious but doable. It will also allow the U.S. to reclaim a leadership role in the world in terms of reducing greenhouse gases."
Our View: EPA rules would be breath of fresh air for Maine residents, businesses (Portland Press Herald [ME] , 06/02/14)
"Our farms, forests and fisheries can’t afford the cost of inaction on climate change....That’s why Mainers should applaud the announcement Monday of proposed rules by the Environmental Protection Agency. In what would be the most ambitious step to date to address the world’s most serious environmental problem, the rules would regulate carbon pollution from power plants for the first time ... It’s important that members of Maine’s congressional delegation – Democratic, Republican and independent – stand up for this common-sense rule change that would benefit Maine people."
EDITORIAL: Obama's carbon rules a step in the right direction (San Francisco Chronicle [CA] , 06/02/14)
"President Obama has just taken the boldest step the U.S. has ever taken to fight global warming. ... it's sure to be tangled up in court for some time to come.... The big disaster would be doing nothing - so Obama should be applauded for this big step in the right direction."
Editorial: A chance to lead the way on climate change; Utah should embrace CO2 rules. (Salt Lake Tribune [UT] , 06/02/14)
"The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Monday announced a new set of standards aimed at significantly reducing the amount of carbon dioxide American power plants pour into the atmosphere every year. It is a step that is necessary in order to head off a future where we see the planet heat up and the quality of life driven down, here and around the world. It is a plan that is much less ambitious than one Republicans proposed six years ago. ... he rules create an opportunity for those states and industries that are clever enough to grab it to not merely survive, but to prosper."
Editorial: Trying to fix a polluted past (Daily Review [Towanda, PA], 06/02/14)
"People from Northeast Pennsylvania have first-hand knowledge of what happens when coal producers and utilities don't bear a cost for pollution: they pollute. ...Obama will announce carbon emission standards that will mark an historic advance for environmental regulation and air quality.... Because Pennsylvania is downwind from many coal-fired power plants in other states, the new regulatory regime will have vast benefits for public health. The state government should embrace the initiative"
Christie boxes himself into a corner on climate pact: Editorial (Star-Ledger Newark [NJ] , 06/01/14)
"So you’d think that Christie would reconsider his decision to pull us out of the popular Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, known as “RGGI.” But no. The governor casually dismissed the role of climate change in Sandy and continues to insist that this respected, greatly improved multistate program doesn’t work — despite all evidence to the contrary.... appellate judges recently ruled that the Christie administration had acted illegally, and ordered it to allow public comment, and — even more important — to formally repeal the state’s rules if it doesn’t want to obey them."
EDITORIAL: Our view: Carbon debate is ready to heat up (Roanoke Times [VA], 06/01/14)
"Rather than shoring up the wall of resistance, political and industrial leaders should be actively engaged in finding ways to keep the economy running and the lights on while reducing greenhouse gases.
Congressional inaction has left it to the Environmental Protection Agency to act."
EDITORIAL: Climate inaction (Free Lance-Star [VA] , 06/01/14)
"Without a doubt, the sooner such deniers either change their minds or get out of the way, the sooner unified, meaningful action can be taken. Well-known columnists and commentators George Will and Charles Krauthammer continue to deny the role of climate change in the increasing severity of winter and summer storms, droughts and floods, temperature extremes and wildfires—despite hard, incontrovertible data to the contrary. They cite old research and take the statements of scientists and climate change advocates out of context— deepening the well of disinformation and contributing to conservative intransigence on the issue. Time is of the essence here, and they are helping to waste it.... In areas of key state and national economic and strategic impor tance, such as southeastern Virginia, more jobs are created and preserved once it’s determined which areas are practical to protect and which must be abandoned.
There is much work to do and we must begin now."
First female American Indian federal judge quietly confirmed (San Antonio Express-News [TX] , 06/01/14)
Elaine Ayala column: "it's important to celebrate the great news in the U.S. Senate's confirmation of Diane Humetewa to the federal bench in Arizona. A member of the Hopi Nation, Humetewa, 49, made history May 14 by becoming only the third American Indian federal judge in U.S. history, and the first woman....Observers noted Humetewa will be the only American Indian on a bench that has almost 900 federal judges. The National Congress of American Indians praised Obama and the Senate but noted many other “qualified, talented people like Diane Humetewa in Indian country ... able and willing to serve.”"
Editorial: Breathe deep (Scranton Times-Tribune [PA] , 06/01/14)
"President Obama will announce carbon emission standards that will mark a historic advance for environmental regulation and air quality. ...Because Pennsylvania is downwind from coal-fired power plants in other states, the new regime will have vast benefits for public health. The state government should embrace the initiative and develop an innovative plan for compliance, using a commitment to leave behind its history of industrial pollution."
Chris Rickert: Walker right to risk principle purity in exchange for John Doe compromise (Wisconsin State Journal, 05/31/14)
Column: "Meanwhile, a purist interpretation of states’ rights has of late been responsible for a spate of embarrassing right-wing positions. The resurgence of the court-invalidated theory of nullification — basically, the belief that states have the legal right to ignore federal law — is one. Another is this idea — recently on display at the state Republican convention — that the 10th Amendment to the Constitution allows states to secede from the union."
EDITORIAL: Carbon dioxide; New limits on greenhouse-gas emissions from power plants take a broad approach (Durango Herald [CO], 05/29/14)
"The EPA is within its authority to regulate greenhouse gases: A 2007 U.S. Supreme Court ruling clarified that. Nevertheless, it is a sure bet that the agency’s new rule will face legal challenges from those whose interests are threatened by it. That should not deter the EPA from doing what is right. The rule, which is expected to be announced Monday, is a significant move in that direction."
Louisiana House should kill bill intended to nullify levee lawsuit against oil, gas: Editorial (Times-Picayune [LA] , 05/28/14)
"What the legislation does is severely limit which agencies can file suit and for what sort of damages....and would leave residents in greater New Orleans with no practical remedy for the increased risk of storm damage caused by coastal erosion....SB 469 would take away the rights of other local government entities to pursue "any right or cause of action arising from any activity" involving permitting under the Coastal Zone Management program and some provisions of the federal Clean Water Act and the federal Rivers and Harbors Act. ... Those residents and the levees and pumps built to protect them are threatened by the wetlands loss created by oil and gas pipelines. Why shouldn't the industry be asked to pay part of the cost to repair it?"
EDITORIAL: In Our View: A Coal-Free Washington? Changes are coming to the way electricity is produced, and state is preparing itself (Columbian [WA], 05/28/14)
"Coal is messy to extract in a process that leaves scars upon the landscape, and the burning of it contributes to greenhouse gas emissions.... whether or not the burning of coal contributes to climate change — a vast majority of scientific research says that it does — the fact is that Washington would be wise to position itself for the future. ...The Clean Air Act of 1970, signed into law by Richard Nixon, requires the Environmental Protection Agency to regulate pollution that threatens public health and welfare."
Editorial | Well-deserved honor for ‘Fitz’ (Courier-Journal [KY] , 05/26/14)
"Consider the Cincinnati-based federal agency with a clunky name, ORSANCO, and a big mission to keep cleaning up the Ohio River.... President Barack Obama has just appointed Tom FitzGerald.... Mr. FitzGerald, a Louisville attorney and director of the Kentucky Resources Council, has made a career out of representing people on the receiving end of pollution. He has fought fearlessly for enforcement of clean air and clean water laws, using a science-based and fact-based approach that has earned him respect from all sides. He sweats the details, poring over the arcane language of environmental laws and rules, with an eye toward justice, fairness and a cleaner world. And he can’t be fooled. Most recently, Mr. FitzGerald won an important court case that preemptively blocked the developers of the private, natural gas liquids Bluegrass Pipeline from using the power of eminent domain to buy easements in Kentucky. President Obama’s appointment of Mr. Fitzgerald is well-deserved national recognition. We are glad he accepted."
Editorial: Phasing out coal for energy is right — and smart (News Tribune [WA] , 05/23/14)
"Among sources of energy, “coal” is the four-letter word. It’s often dangerous to extract from the ground. Its shipment on coal trains clogs traffic in urban areas. And when it’s burned to produce electricity, either here or when shipped abroad, it adds to the greenhouse gases that scientists say contribute to global warming.... taking steps toward a coal-free future is a wise path for Washington."