Quantcast
Skip Navigation
Judging the Environment judicial nominations photo
 

A joint project tracking federal judicial nominations and courts.



 

Issues

Clean Water
Polluter lawsuits are trying to effectively repeal the Clean Water Act for up to 60 percent of the nation's streams, creeks, and rivers. In light of recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions and administrative actions that are jeopardizing federal water pollution protections, Congress is considering the Clean Water Protection Act to reaffirm Congress' intent to protect all waters of the United States.

Fair Pay for Federal Judges
The effectiveness of our federal courts depends on our ability to attract the most exceptional lawyers to become federal judges and then keep them on the bench to administer our laws.

Takings Law
The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides that “private property [shall not] be taken for public use, without just compensation.”

Nuclear Option and the Filibuster
The filibuster provides a valuable safeguard that prevents a narrow majority from forcing its priorities on all Americans.

Ninth Circuit Split
Anti-environmental special interests are trying to "judge-shop" by dividing the Ninth Circuit in order to alter the results of cases and generate more industry-friendly decisions.

What's At Stake: Fair Judges Overview
Federal judges often decide the fate of safeguards for clean air, clean water, endangered species, and special natural places.

Access to Courts
Citizen access to the courts ensures that essential legal safeguards for people and the environment are upheld and enforced.

The Commerce Clause
Almost every major federal environmental statute relies on Commerce Clause authority

 

 Learn More About What's at Stake